Conducting seamless and democratic elections in Kenya has not been a guaranteed eventuality if past elections are to be considered. Agents responsible for large-scale violence have seldom been thoroughly investigated, arrested or prosecuted.
The rule of law in most cases has been put aside in the context of political competition which has led to the presumption of innocence for political violence perpetrators. It is a shortcoming that has also been pointed out by representatives of Kenyan Civil society.
The government has to accept that use of election technology does not guarantee credibility of elections. Technology has become a ‘tool’ that competing parties exploit to either play victims of election contraventions or illegally declare themselves election winners. This was manifestly evident in the 2017 general elections that precipitated a petition which produced a historic overturning of election outcomes and a court order for repeat polls.
Election technology in Kenya is the new frontier for claims of fraud in the manner of its procurement, deployment and use, which, depending on a candidate’s political side, is either purely technical and dependable or purely political and worth trashing. Addressing this issue will be imperative to avoiding violence around elections and by-elections as the country heads to critical succession polls in 2022.
The article is clearly talking about the Kenyan elections and how Technology is the major cause of election fraund in Kenya, therefore the article should suggest solutions that can be put in place to end technological challenges during the election process,